Posted by: Matt
Comment: #1
Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:46 AM
Regarding the nameless Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:37 AM comment...would you care to demonstrate exactly when or where Prager advocates the view that women should be treated as property? That's what is done in Muslim cultures today. Prager is talking about a Western culture that has stopped teaching women to control themselves and to be strong and independent, as their grandmothers were. It's the very opposite of owning women as property. I think it's funny, too, how the word "antiqued" (I think you mean "antiquated") has this horrible, negative connotation attached to it by liberals, but we're never told the reason for that. If it happened in the old days, it MUST be bad, right? Today, we're progressive and enlightened and have no need for the self-control that was taught to our sons and daughters in the past. Right?
|
Posted by:
Comment: #2
Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:37 AM
Yes! let's go back in time to when women were property.
Property can't get depressed - and if it does - who cares as long as they bring their strong, manly men dinner!
By the way, your antiqued ideas about gender just show your age.
|
