The pick of Sarah Palin has gotten many Republicans excited about voting for presidential candidate John McCain. And that, my friends, is a genuine miracle.

These GOPers, it must be noted, are electrified by the idea of Palin as much as they are by the candidate. In many ways, it's comparable to the allegiance Democratic Party nominee Barack Obama enjoys — a devotion that isn't measured by legislative accomplishment or experience.

Oh, wait. Palin isn't running against Obama.

Palin, you see, is so thoroughly incompetent, downright beatable and hopelessly laughable that an army of columnists, bloggers and media types immediately jumped on every scandalous rumor and dug up every supposed indiscretion. They exhibit a sneering disdain for any experience attained outside the Beltway.

Preposterous rumors about Obama appear in my inbox with alarming regularity. Most are nonsensical. Yet now, many of the same folks, so deeply revolted by the sorry state of political discourse, are peddling similar rubbish.

Is Palin's 4-month-old child with Down syndrome really hers, or is it her unmarried 17-year-old daughter's? That was the topic of the day on a number of respected political Web sites (as if adopting an ill grandchild were an act of debauchery to begin with).

Well, it turns out that Palin's daughter is five months pregnant, so it could not be hers, which is even better. Palin supports abstinence programs, proving she is a bungling hypocrite. Others insinuate that Palin is also an unfit mother for neglecting her children by running for office and, get this, putting them in a position to be smeared.

So much for celebrating the plight of the working mom. Then again, maybe you have to be the right kind of working mom.

Next, the always irascible Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., claimed that Palin is a supporter of the "Nazi sympathizer" Pat Buchanan. Palin, apparently, wore a button of Buchanan when the then-candidate visited the town she was mayor of in 1999.

You may find it confounding that partisan Democrats believe that Obama's relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, terrorist Bill Ayers and convicted felon Tony Rezko are unfair "distractions," yet Palin's 17-year-old daughter's pregnancy demands front-page attention from both The Washington Post and The New York Times.

Now e-mails pour in from folks who claim to represent "women" — women, I suspect, who wouldn't vote for a Republican ticket if Susan B. Anthony adorned it. They suddenly and wholly are offended by identity politics.

Palin is, without doubt, in part a token pick. So what? The appeal of a candidate includes his or her policy position but also background (that's why we are blessed with the folksy charm of Joe Biden), experience, ability, race and gender. Hillary, despite what you've heard, is not the smartest woman in America. And can anyone dispute that one element of Obama's allure is the potential of him becoming the first African-American president?

Maybe critics believe if they keep telling the public that McCain's pick is scandalous and irresponsible, the Republican nominee will tap a more reasonable mate — you know, such as Joe Lieberman — before it's too late.

Who knows? Maybe the lynch mob will bury Palin's candidacy. Maybe Palin will bury herself by proving to be incompetent and unworthy. But how can a candidate be portrayed as a failure by experts who haven't heard a word from her mouth?

This not only is dishonest but also betrays a real political anxiety over Palin's impact.

Do vice presidential candidates have the ability to sway elections or rally parties? Almost never.

But in this presidential election, excitement has become, for the first time, a shared experience.

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of "Nanny State." Visit his Web site at www.DavidHarsanyi.com. To find out more about David Harsanyi and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 THE DENVER POST

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.