Another Real Estate Crisis Is About to Hit

For a picture of the U.S. real estate crisis, imagine New Orleans wrecked by Hurricane Katrina, and before the waters even begin to recede, a second Katrina hits.

The 1,120,000 lost U.S. retail jobs in 2008 are a signal that the second stage of the real estate bust is about to hit the economy. This time, it will be commercial real estate — shopping malls, strip malls, warehouses and office buildings. As businesses close and rents decline, the ability to service the mortgages on the overbuilt commercial real estate disappears.

The overbuilding was helped along by the irresponsibly low interest rates, but the main impetus came from the slide of the U.S. saving rate to zero and the rise in household indebtedness. The shrinkage of savings and the increase in debt raised consumer spending to 72 percent of gross domestic product. The proliferation of malls and the warehouses that service them reflect the rise in consumer spending as a share of GDP.

Like the federal government, consumers spent more than they earned and borrowed to cover the difference. Obviously, this could not go on forever, and consumer debt has reached its limit.

Shopping malls are losing anchor stores, and large chains are closing stores and even going out of business altogether. Developers who borrowed to finance commercial ventures are in trouble, as are the holders of the mortgages, derivatives and other financial junk associated with the loans.

The main source of the economic crisis is the infantile belief of U.S. policymakers that an economy could be based on debt expansion. As offshoring moved jobs, incomes and GDP out of the country, debt expanded to take the place of the missing income. When the offshored goods and services were brought back to be sold to Americans, the trade deficit rose, adding another level of financing for an economy that consumes more than it produces.

The growth of debt has outpaced the growth of real output. Yet, the solution offered by Obama's economic team is to expand debt further. This is not surprising, as Obama's economic team consists of the very people who brought on the debt crisis. Now they are going to make it worse.

The unexamined question is: Who is going to finance the next wave of debt?

The U.S. budget deficit for fiscal year 2009 already appears to be on a path to $2 trillion, and that is before Obama's stimulus program. What we are looking at is a $3 trillion budget deficit if Obama's program is enacted in time to impact the economy this year.

Foreign countries can finance a $500 billion U.S. budget deficit out of their trade surpluses with the United States. But foreigners do not have the funds to finance a U.S. budget deficit in the trillions of dollars, and they would not finance such a deficit even if they had the funds. Foreigners are overweighted in dollar holdings and prefer to lighten their holding rather than add to them. America's economic prospects are dim, as are the dollar's prospects as reserve currency. An annual budget deficit in the trillions of dollars makes the dollar's prospects appear even dimmer.

The federal government's likely solution to the debt problem will be to monetize the debt — that is, the government will finance its deficit by printing money.

Debt will be inflated away. But for those Americans without jobs or whose incomes do not rise with inflation, life will be cruel.

Life is already cruel for Americans living on retirement savings. Not only has the stock market bust reduced their wealth by half, but also their remaining assets are producing no income. Interest rates are so low that debt instruments produce no income, and there are scant capital gains in the stock market. Retirees are living by consuming their capital.

America's economic policy of low interest rates and debt expansion bodes ill for everyone living off their savings. Their future prospects are even worse, as high inflation will destroy the value of their savings, especially if held in cash or debt instruments, including "safe" U.S. Treasuries.

There are more intelligent ways to try to escape from the current crisis. However, the financial gangsters and their shills that Obama has put in charge of economic policy are thinking only of their own interest. What happens to the American people is not a concern.

A compassionate government would handle the crisis in this way:

The trillions of dollars in credit default swaps (CDS) should be declared null and void. These "swaps" are simply bets that financial instruments and companies will fail, and the bulk of the bets are made by people and institutions that do not hold the financial instruments or shares in the companies. The ideology that financial markets were self-regulating allowed illegal gambling free rein. There is no reason under the sun for taxpayers to bail out gamblers.

The bailout money, instead of being given to favored financial institutions to finance their acquisition of other institutions, should be used to refinance the defaulting mortgages. This would slow, if not stop, the growing inventory of foreclosed properties that is driving down home prices.

The mark-to-market rule should be suspended until the real values of the troubled properties and instruments can be determined. Suspension of the rule would prevent the failure of sound institutions and lessen the need for a bailout.

Interest rates have to be raised in order to encourage saving and to provide incomes to retirees.

To preserve the dollar's status as reserve currency, a credible policy of reducing both budget and trade deficits must be announced. In the near term, the budget deficit can be reduced by $500 billion by withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan and by cutting a bloated defense budget that represents the now unattainable goal of U.S. world hegemony.

The trade deficit can be significantly reduced by bringing offshored jobs back to America. One way to do this is to tax corporations according to the value added to their output that occurs in the United States. Corporations that produce their products for U.S. markets abroad would have high tax rates; those that produce domestically would have low tax rates.

This approach to the economic crisis stands in marked contrast with the approach of the gangsters running U.S. economic policy. The gangsters are using the crisis as an opportunity to steal from taxpayers and to finance their misdeeds and exorbitant salaries with Federal Reserve loans. Their shills among economists and the financial press tell the people that the solution is to fatten up the banks with funds so they will resume lending to an over-indebted public that will then return to the shopping malls.

This unrealistic approach to a serious crisis indicates a leadership crisis on top of an economic crisis.

To find out more about Paul Craig Roberts, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.